Why Sam Altman Got Fried from OpenAI

Former OpenAI board member Helen Toner on Tuesday unveiled many of the specifics surrounding the company’s failed ouster of CEO Sam Altman last year.
  • “For years, Sam had made it really difficult for the board to actually do (its) job by withholding information, misrepresenting things that were happening at the company and in some cases outright lying,” she said.

The details

  • Toner said that the board was never informed of ChatGPT’s initial launch; they found out “on Twitter.” 
  • Altman didn’t tell the board that he owned OpenAI’s startup fund, “even though he constantly was claiming to be an independent board member with no financial interest in the company.”
  • She added that he would regularly provide inaccurate information about the few safety processes in place at the company.
Two OpenAI executives then came to the board in October 2023. These executives — complete with documentation of Altman’s behavior — detailed the “toxic atmosphere” that Altman was creating and said he wasn’t “the right person to lead the company to AGI.”
  • The combination of these two factors led the board to act as it did. The result, as we know, is that the board was fired and Altman returned to helm the company (a classic Uno Reverse, if you will). Toner said that the surge of employee support for his return was partly a result of “how scared people are to go against Sam.”

Key Takeaways

Based on Helen Toner’s statements and the details surrounding the failed ouster of Sam Altman from OpenAI, several Machiavellian characteristics can be identified in Altman’s behavior:

  1. Manipulation and Deception:
    • Withholding Information: Altman made it difficult for the board to perform its duties by withholding critical information.
    • Misrepresentation and Lies: He misrepresented events and outright lied about certain aspects of the company’s operations, reflecting a tendency to manipulate the truth to maintain control.
  2. Lack of Transparency:
    • Secretive Launch: The board was not informed about the initial launch of ChatGPT and only learned about it through social media, indicating a deliberate effort to keep significant actions hidden from oversight.
    • Undisclosed Financial Interests: Altman did not disclose his ownership of OpenAI’s startup fund while claiming to be an independent board member, which suggests a strategic concealment of potential conflicts of interest.
  3. Undermining Governance:
    • Inaccurate Safety Information: He regularly provided inaccurate information about the company’s safety processes, undermining the board’s ability to oversee and ensure safe practices.
  4. Creating a Toxic Environment:
    • Toxic Atmosphere: Reports from executives detailed a toxic atmosphere under Altman’s leadership, indicating a use of fear and intimidation to consolidate power and control over the company.
  5. Cultivating Loyalty Through Fear:
    • Employee Support Driven by Fear: The strong employee support for Altman’s return was partly attributed to the fear of going against him, showcasing a Machiavellian tactic of maintaining loyalty through intimidation.
  6. Strategic and Ruthless Leadership:
    • Return to Power: Despite the board’s actions, Altman managed to return to his position, demonstrating his strategic acumen and ruthless approach to regaining control, akin to a “classic Uno Reverse.”

These takeaways highlight Altman’s use of manipulation, lack of transparency, strategic deception, and cultivation of fear to maintain and regain power, reflecting classic Machiavellian traits in leadership.

Related Posts